I’ve been arguing with few friends of mine
over many topics, and I remember one we almost got angry at each other. We were
talking about history and relativity of it, and although we all agreed that
History is written by the victorious ones, we couldn’t agree on who is making
the history.
The first thesis was easy – people tend to be seen as
individualistic entities, free from others’ influences. But it’s a myth. There
is no single person who can claim that he/she is free from the influence of
other people, it’s simply impossible. Human nature is to incorporate alien
experiences and ideas into your own blood circle. We learn throughout our
lifetime. We abandon something that ceased to fulfill our needs. Simple. And I
came across some statements giving as the example kids that have grown up in
the jungle (oh yes, big black panther saved them, wolf gave its milk, weird
thing no whale-human family in this picture), and supposedly those kids were
free from society’s rules. Yes, but they are not entirely free from ANY rules,
my dear ladies and gents. Whoever told you that animals don’t have rules was
stupid and I challenge this idiot to a duel. They have, wolves are really well
organized in a pack, apes as well (don’t know much on apes, cause I hate them),
so claiming that a kid has grown up in such environment as tabula rasa is pure nonsense. The kid adapts to the society in
which one grows up, be it the human society, animals, or, the ultimate one –
fangirls.
And here we are close to the main problem – history. Is
history created by individuals or by many?
Some of us
who took part in this rhetoric feud were on the “singular perch”, the others
were on “plural perch”, as we called it. History, as we are taught about, is
made of famous names, Caesar, Hannibal, Nebuchadnezzar, Henry VIII, Napoleon,
Hitler, Stalin, etc. They made the history, they changed the history, they
distorted the history. People who don’t like history say: “Oh it’s only dates
and names”. Names of the places, names of the people. True, talented
individuals are like the pebble that moves the avalanche. But what is this
avalanche? Is it single snowflake? No, billions of them. Only then they can
form a deadly weapon of nature.
The same goes for people. Individuals are like stepping
stones, brilliant but powerless. They would end up as no one if they didn’t
have thousands following them. Those nameless thousands who are so eager to
give up their lives for someone else’s wish. Such individuals always appear in
the times of darkness and uncertainty. They play the role of a beacon light.
They show the way, but the beacon fire is useless when there is no one to
guide, no one to lead, and no place to lead to.
Julius
Caesar – his dictatorship was in a crucial times for Rome. If it wasn’t for him, there wouldn’t be
the Empire as we know it. He came just in the right time. And he paved the road
for August, Tiberius, Caligula, and others. If it wasn’t for senate in Rome, neither August nor
later Tiberius would end up as emperors or at least they would be less
powerful. Every time I’m home, I read I,
Claudius by Robert Graves. I do like Antiquity, so immersing myself for a
day in such book is a nice journey to the times of horror. Great individuals
here lost because they didn’t have other people behind their back.
Hitler
grasped the power in a very favorable moment, people were angry, disappointed
and easy to be moved. They needed someone to lead them, for better or for
worse. And the man came. You know, it’s not like I’m praising this monster, but
he got some great influence on people and knew how to move their hearts. And
mob doesn’t think with the head but with a heart. The same goes for crowds
during the gladiators fights. Mob could force its decision on Caesars! If no
one followed Hitler, there wouldn’t be such mass hysteria like that. It would
be just failed dream of a man. He had millions supporting him and only those
millions got him the victory.
And don’t let me start on Stalin. He’s one of the worst in 20th
century. Maybe only Pol-Pot is beating him, but not sure.
To fully understand history - don't rely on school books only. They have to be concise, and for most of the people they are just names and dates. Read the whole history environment, as I call it. You like caesars' period in Rome? So don't sit on your 3-letters but read Swetonius, Tacitus, Marcus Aurelius, Julius Caesar, modern books on such period. And don't blame history classes. They have to be just names and dates.
To fully understand history - don't rely on school books only. They have to be concise, and for most of the people they are just names and dates. Read the whole history environment, as I call it. You like caesars' period in Rome? So don't sit on your 3-letters but read Swetonius, Tacitus, Marcus Aurelius, Julius Caesar, modern books on such period. And don't blame history classes. They have to be just names and dates.
So my final words would be like that:
Individuals are like head. Head thinks and receives the stimulus. But without
arms and legs it can do nothing. Arms don’t think, they crush the stone though.